인식 조사 번역(한국어 원본)연구목적: 우리나라에서는 전 국민을 대상으로 한 설문조사가 없었던 관계로 전국 각지에서 20세 이상의 일반인을 대상으로 한 고른 조사를 토대로 치과 임프란트 와 치과 치료에 대한 일반인의 인식도를 조사하여 올바른 치과산업의 기초를 제공하고, 나아가 구강보건정책수립 및 국민구강보건발전에 기여하고자한다.
연구방법: 전문 리서치기관을 통한 설문조사이고 표본 수는 3000명으로 하며 임프란트에 대한 일반인식, 임프란트 정보 경로, 임프란트 시술 실패 및 사용 및 유지관리 교육의 필요성, 임프란트 치료 전 후 만족도, 합병증 인지도 및 경험여부, 치아 상실 후 희망 임프란트 정보처에 대하여 조사하였다.
결과: 현재 자신의 소득수준을 감안할 때 임프란트 치료비로적정치료비로는 100만 원 미만 70.6%, 시술 후 실패는 16.5%가 경험한 것으로 나타났고 임프란트 사용 및 유지관리 교육이 잘 이루어지지 않는 것으로 나타남. 임프란트 치료기관으로 개인치과 151명(77.8%)으로 가장 많았고 대학병원치과 23명(11.9%), 대형 네트워크 치과 20명(10.3%)순이며, 각각을 보면 대학병원:대학병원 이라 서라는 응답이 52.2%로 가장 높았고, 지인의 추천 입소문과 광고는 각각 17.4%로 집계 됐으며 개인치과 : 지인의 추천, 입소문 61.3%로 가장 높았고 집이나 직장과 가까워서 20.7%이고 대형네트워크치과 : 지인의 추천 입소문 45.0%, 광고 40.0%를 보였다. 임프란트 치료 치과를 선택한 기준은 의사숙련도는 3.66점으로 가장 만족하는 것으로 나타났고, 임프란트 시술 후 다음의 합병증 혹은 부작용으로 음식물 끼임 55.7%,이 가장 많았고, 임프란트 식립실패 10.3%, 보철물 파절 9.3%, 신경손상을 경험한 대상자는 8.2%,를 경험하였다. 치아 상실 후 희망 임프란트 정보처로 친구나 주변지인 38.4%로 가장 높았고 TV와 같은 대중 매체20.6%,치과의사19.7% 순인 것으로 나타났다. 임프란트 치료 치과의 전반적 만족도에 영향을 미치는 변수들(9가지)과 임프란트의 합병증요인의 관계를 알아 보기위하여 각각을 다중 회귀분석을 실시한 결과 전 자는 회귀모형의 결정계수(R Square)는 .271로 회귀모형의 설명력이 약 27%정도였고 모형의 적합도 검정결과 F값 36.788로 유의수준 5%이내에서 유의 한 것으로 나타나 독립변수들이 종속변수인 임프란트 전반적 만족도를 잘 설명하고 있다고 판단할 수 있고.
후자는 회귀모형의 결정계수(R Square)는 .101로 회귀모형의 설명력이 약 10% 정도였고 모형의 적합도 검정결과 F값 3.484로 유의수준 5%이내에서 유의 한 것으로 나타나 독립변수들이 종속변수인 임프란트 전반적 만족도를 잘
설명하고 있다고 판단할 수 있다.
분석결과 신경손상, 음식물 끼임, 상악동염, 축농증, 보철물 파절, 임프란트 주위염은 유의하지 않았고 임프란트 식립 실패만 기울기에 대한추정치(β)는 -0.85, 기울기에 대한 표준오차는 023으로 유의한 것으로 나타났다(p<0.001). |
인식 조사 번역(영어 번역본)Objective: Because there had never been a survey run in Korea with the whole country as the subject, the objective is to run a thorough investigation based on people of over 20 years of age in all areas of the country to find out general awareness of dental treatment in order to provide foundational information for the dental industry and in turn, contribute to establishment of policies for dental hygiene and development.
Method: Survey was run by a professional research organization and 3000 samples (subjects) were used. The following were investigated: General knowledge about implants, path for the information source for implants, failure in implant treatment and need for training on usage and maintenance, level of satisfaction after implant treatment, awareness about complications and experience of complication, information source for implant after loss of teeth.
Result: Considering the current income level, 70.6% answered that suitable implant treatment cost is under 1 million won, and 16.5% experienced failure after and it was found that training about usage and post maintenance was not being provided effectively. As for where the treatments were carried out, 151 (77.8%) was most at private dental clinic, 23 (11.9%) were at Dental Department in General University Hospital and major network dental clinic was least with 20 (10.3%). As for reasons for choosing the above organizations for treatment:
1. University Hospital: “Because it’s general hospital” reply was most at 52.2%. Words of mouth, recommendations made by acquaintances and advertisements were 17.4%.
2. Private Clinic: Words of mouth, recommendations made by acquaintances were highest at 61.3% and closeness to vicinity of home or work was at 20.7%.
3. Large Network Dental Clinic: Words of mouth, recommendations made by acquaintances were at 45.0% and advertisement was 40.0%.
As for the standard by which to choose dental clinic for implant treatment was dentist’s skill with 3.66 score that was the highest satisfaction.
As for complications after implant treatment, stuck food stuff was highest at 55.7%, implant placement failure was 10.3%, implant prosthesis breakage was 9.3% and 8.2% experienced nerve damage. As for source of information after loss of teeth, friends and acquaintances were highest at 38.4%, followed by media such as TV (20.6%) and dentists (19.7%). In order to find out the relationship between the variables (9 in total) that affect the overall satisfaction towards implant treatments and causes for implant treatments’ complications, each underwent multiple regression analysis. Result showed that the regression model of the former’s coefficient of determination (R Square) was .271, so its power of explanation was approximately 27%, and the model’s suitability result had F value of 36.788, which was within the significance level of 5%. So it can be determined that the independent variables explain the implant satisfaction quite well, which is their dependent variable.
The regression model of the later’s coefficient of determination (R Square) was ..101, with its power of explanation at approximately 10% and the model’s suitability result had F value of 3.484, which was within the significance level of 5%. So it can be determined that the independent variables explain the implant satisfaction quite well, which is their dependent variable.
Result also showed that nerve damage, stuck food stuff, inflammation of maxillary sinus, sinusitis, prosthesis breakage and inflammation around the implant were not significant and only implant placement failure showed significance (p<0.001) with inclination estimation (β)of -0.85, and standard deviation of inclination at 023. |
